Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities.

BACKGROUND: Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function. OBJECTIVE: To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow. METHODS: Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 µA of applied skull currents). RESULTS: Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25-0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2-18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive. CONCLUSION: In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.

Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities.

Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function. We used Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels in an in-vivo rat model of TES to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 µA of applied skull currents). We demonstrate that electric fields below 0.5 V/m acutely modulate firing rate in 5% of neurons recorded in the hippocampus. At these intensities, average firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 7 % per V/m. For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for cathodal stimulation and diminished for anodal stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive. Our results indicate that responses to TES at clinically relevant intensities are driven by a fraction of high-responder excitatory neurons, with polarity-specific effects. We conclude that transcranial electric stimulation is an effective neuromodulator at clinically realistic intensities.

Weak DCS causes a relatively strong cumulative boost of synaptic plasticity with spaced learning.

BACKGROUND: Electric fields generated during direct current stimulation (DCS) are known to modulate activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in-vitro. This provides a mechanistic explanation for the lasting behavioral effects observed with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in human learning experiments. However, previous in-vitro synaptic plasticity experiments show relatively small effects despite using strong fields compared to what is expected with conventional tDCS in humans (20 V/m vs. 1 V/m). There is therefore a need to improve the effectiveness of tDCS at realistic field intensities. Here we leverage the observation that effects of learning are known to accumulate over multiple bouts of learning, known as spaced learning. HYPOTHESIS: We propose that effects of DCS on synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) accumulate over time in a spaced learning paradigm, thus revealing effects at more realistic field intensities. METHODS: We leverage a standard model for spaced learning by inducing LTP with repeated bouts of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in hippocampal slice preparations. We studied the cumulative effects of DCS paired with TBS at various intensities applied during the induction of LTP in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. RESULTS: As predicted, DCS applied during repeated bouts of theta burst stimulation (TBS) resulted in an increase of LTP. This spaced learning effect is saturated quickly with strong TBS protocols and stronger fields. In contrast, weaker TBS and the weakest electric fields of 2.5 V/m resulted in the strongest relative efficacies (12% boost in LTP per 1 V/m applied). CONCLUSIONS: Weak DCS causes a relatively strong cumulative effect of spaced learning on synaptic plasticity. Staturarion may have masked stronger effects sizes in previous in-vitro studies. Relative effect sizes of DCS are now closer in line with human tDCS experiments.

Cutaneous sensation of electrical stimulation waveforms.

BACKGROUND: Skin sensation is the primary factor limiting the intensity of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). It is well established that different waveforms generate different sensations, yet transcranial stimulation has been limited to a relatively small number of prototypical waveforms. OBJECTIVE: We explore whether alternative stimulation waveforms could substantially reduce skin sensation and thus allow for stronger intensities in tES. METHODS: We systematically tested a range of waveforms in a series of 6 exploratory experiments stimulating human adults on the forearm and in one instance on the head. Subjects were asked to rate skin sensation level on a numerical scale from "none" to "extreme". RESULTS: High frequency (>1 kHz) monophasic square wave stimulation was found to decrease in sensation with increasing duty cycle, baseline, and frequency, but the sensation was never lower than for constant current stimulation. For the purpose of injecting a net direct current (DC), a constant current is optimal. For stimulation with alternating current (AC), sensation decreased with increasing frequency, consistent with previous reports. Amplitude modulation did not reduce sensation below stimulation with constant AC amplitude, and biphasic square waveforms produced higher sensation levels than biphasic sinusoidal waveforms. Furthermore, for DC stimulation, sensation levels on the arm were similar to those reported on the head. CONCLUSION: Our comparisons of various waveforms for monophasic and biphasic stimulation indicate that conventional DC and AC waveforms may provide the lowest skin sensations levels for transcutaneous electrical stimulation. These results are likely generalizable to tES applications.

Effects of direct current stimulation on synaptic plasticity in a single neuron.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (DCS) has lasting effects that may be explained by a boost in synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP). We hypothesized that this boost is the result of a modulation of somatic spiking in the postsynaptic neuron, as opposed to indirect network effects. To test this directly we record somatic spiking in a postsynaptic neuron during LTP induction with concurrent DCS. METHODS: We performed rodent in-vitro patch-clamp recordings at the soma of individual CA1 pyramidal neurons. LTP was induced with theta-burst stimulation (TBS) applied concurrently with DCS. To test the causal role of somatic polarization, we manipulated polarization via current injections. We also used a computational multi-compartment neuron model that captures the effect of electric fields on membrane polarization and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. RESULTS: TBS-induced LTP was enhanced when paired with anodal DCS as well as depolarizing current injections. In both cases, somatic spiking during the TBS was increased, suggesting that evoked somatic activity is the primary factor affecting LTP modulation. However, the boost of LTP with DCS was less than expected given the increase in spiking activity alone. In some cells, we also observed DCS-induced spiking, suggesting DCS also modulates LTP via induced network activity. The computational model reproduces these results and suggests that they are driven by both direct changes in postsynaptic spiking and indirect changes due to network activity. CONCLUSION: DCS enhances synaptic plasticity by increasing postsynaptic somatic spiking, but we also find that an increase in network activity may boost but also limit this enhancement.